Waiting for PostgreSQL 13 – Enable BEFORE row-level triggers for partitioned tables

On 18th of March 2020, Alvaro Herrera committed patch:

Enable BEFORE row-level triggers for partitioned tables
... with the limitation that the tuple must remain in the same
Reviewed-by: Ashutosh Bapat
Discussion: https://postgr.es/m/20200227165158.GA2071@alvherre.pgsql

Continue reading Waiting for PostgreSQL 13 – Enable BEFORE row-level triggers for partitioned tables

Waiting for PostgreSQL 10 – Implement syntax for transition tables in AFTER triggers.

Another one missed, quite a long time ago, too..:

On 4th of November 2016, Kevin Grittner committed patch:

Implement syntax for transition tables in AFTER triggers.
This is infrastructure for the complete SQL standard feature.  No
support is included at this point for execution nodes or PLs.  The
intent is to add that soon.
As this patch leaves things, standard syntax can create tuplestores
to contain old and/or new versions of rows affected by a statement.
References to these tuplestores are in the TriggerData structure.
C triggers can access the tuplestores directly, so they are usable,
but they cannot yet be referenced within a SQL statement.

Continue reading Waiting for PostgreSQL 10 – Implement syntax for transition tables in AFTER triggers.

Waiting for PostgreSQL 10 – Implement table partitioning.

I had two month delay related to some work, but now I can finally write about:

On 7th of December, Robert Haas committed patch:

Implement table partitioning.
Table partitioning is like table inheritance and reuses much of the
existing infrastructure, but there are some important differences.
The parent is called a partitioned table and is always empty; it may
not have indexes or non-inherited constraints, since those make no
sense for a relation with no data of its own.  The children are called
partitions and contain all of the actual data.  Each partition has an
implicit partitioning constraint.  Multiple inheritance is not
allowed, and partitioning and inheritance can't be mixed.  Partitions
can't have extra columns and may not allow nulls unless the parent
does.  Tuples inserted into the parent are automatically routed to the
correct partition, so tuple-routing ON INSERT triggers are not needed.
Tuple routing isn't yet supported for partitions which are foreign
tables, and it doesn't handle updates that cross partition boundaries.
Currently, tables can be range-partitioned or list-partitioned.  List
partitioning is limited to a single column, but range partitioning can
involve multiple columns.  A partitioning "column" can be an
Because table partitioning is less general than table inheritance, it
is hoped that it will be easier to reason about properties of
partitions, and therefore that this will serve as a better foundation
for a variety of possible optimizations, including query planner
optimizations.  The tuple routing based which this patch does based on
the implicit partitioning constraints is an example of this, but it
seems likely that many other useful optimizations are also possible.
Amit Langote, reviewed and tested by Robert Haas, Ashutosh Bapat,
Amit Kapila, Rajkumar Raghuwanshi, Corey Huinker, Jaime Casanova,
Rushabh Lathia, Erik Rijkers, among others.  Minor revisions by me.

Continue reading Waiting for PostgreSQL 10 – Implement table partitioning.

Waiting for 9.5 – Reduce lock levels of some trigger DDL and add FKs

On 5th of April, Simon Riggs committed patch:

Reduce lock levels of some trigger DDL and add FKs
Reduce lock levels to ShareRowExclusive for the following SQL
Original work by Simon Riggs, extracted and refreshed by Andreas Karlsson
New test cases added by Andreas Karlsson
Reviewed by Noah Misch, Andres Freund, Michael Paquier and Simon Riggs

Continue reading Waiting for 9.5 – Reduce lock levels of some trigger DDL and add FKs

How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Triggers

Some people are afraid of triggers.

Reasons for this are not really understandable for me, but I guess it stems from the fact that these are usually application developers, and not database admins. Or they encountered some kind of problem with triggers, and now they tend to think that triggers are inherently evil.

But they are not.

As virtually anything, triggers have some benefits, and some drawbacks. With a bit of thinking you can use them to do really cool things. But first you have to understand what exactly trigger is, how it works, and when to use which kind.

Continue reading How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Triggers

Waiting for 9.3 – Event triggers

On 20th of July, Robert Haas committed patch:

Make new event trigger facility actually do something.
Commit 3855968f328918b6cd1401dd11d109d471a54d40 added syntax, pg_dump,
psql support, and documentation, but the triggers didn't actually fire.
With this commit, they now do.  This is still a pretty basic facility
overall because event triggers do not get a whole lot of information
about what the user is trying to do unless you write them in C; and
there's still no option to fire them anywhere except at the very
beginning of the execution sequence, but it's better than nothing,
and a good building block for future work.
Along the way, add a regression test for ALTER LARGE OBJECT, since
testing of event triggers reveals that we haven't got one.
Dimitri Fontaine and Robert Haas

This was preceded (two days earlier) by commit, also by Robert Haas, which stated:

Syntax support and documentation for event triggers.
They don't actually do anything yet; that will get fixed in a
follow-on commit.  But this gets the basic infrastructure in place,
pg_dump and psql support; and documentation for the anticipated
initial feature set.
Dimitri Fontaine, with review and a bunch of additional hacking by me.
Thom Brown extensively reviewed earlier versions of this patch set,
but there's not a whole lot of that code left in this commit, as it
turns out.

Continue reading Waiting for 9.3 – Event triggers

Waiting for 9.2 – Trigger Depth

On 25th of January, Alvaro Herrera committed patch:

Add pg_trigger_depth() function
This reports the depth level of triggers currently in execution, or zero
if not called from inside a trigger.
No catversion bump in this patch, but you have to initdb if you want
access to the new function.
Author: Kevin Grittner

Continue reading Waiting for 9.2 – Trigger Depth

Waiting for 9.1 – triggers on views

On 10th of October, Tom Lane committed patch by Deal Rasheed, which adds triggers on views:

Support triggers ON views.
This patch adds the SQL-standard concept OF an INSTEAD OF TRIGGER, which
IS fired instead OF performing a physical INSERT/UPDATE/DELETE.  The
AND must figure OUT what TO do TO the underlying TABLES TO implement
the UPDATE.  So this feature can be used TO implement updatable views
USING TRIGGER programming STYLE rather than rule hacking.
IN passing, this patch corrects the names OF SOME COLUMNS IN the
information_schema.triggers VIEW.  It seems the SQL committee renamed
them somewhere BETWEEN SQL:99 AND SQL:2003.
Dean Rasheed, reviewed BY Bernd Helmle; SOME additional hacking BY me.

Continue reading Waiting for 9.1 – triggers on views