On 22nd of January, Tom Lane committed patch by Stephen Frost, which adds column level privileges:
Log Message: ----------- Support column-level privileges, as required by SQL standard. Stephen Frost, with help from KaiGai Kohei and others
Tag: postgresql
Waiting for 8.4 – window functions
A long overdue post about new functionality. At this moment it is no longer such new, as it was committed on 28th of December (yes, I know, I should have written it earlier, Sorry).
On this day Tom Lane committed patch by Hitoshi Harada which adds support for so called window functions:
Support window functions a la SQL:2008. Hitoshi Harada, with some kibitzing from Heikki and Tom.
Waiting for 8.4 – pg_stat_statements
On 4th of January, Tom Lane committed patch by Takahiro Itagaki, which adds new contrib module – pg_stat_statements:
Log Message: ----------- Add contrib/pg_stat_statements for server-wide tracking of statement execution statistics. Takahiro Itagaki
Waiting for 8.4 – remove system objects from \dX
On 6th of January Bruce Momjian committed patch by Greg Sabino Mulane, which fixes one of a very long standing annoyances in PostgreSQL – removes system objects from \dX commands in psql.
Continue reading Waiting for 8.4 – remove system objects from \dX
Maintainable queries – my point of view
This post is basically just an reply to Josh Berkus blog post. Additionally, it refers to “SQL Coding Standards To Each His Own" by Leo Hsu and Regina Obe.
Waiting for 8.4 – Window Functions – teaser
Yesterday Tom Lane committed enormous patch, which had commit log:
Support window functions a la SQL:2008. Hitoshi Harada, with some kibitzing from Heikki and Tom.
… and that would be all. I will write more about it, its use cases, and some detailed examples but now I'm on vacation, and will stay here for some time. You can expect to get the post mid next-week.
explain.depesz.com – update
After nearly 3 weeks of functioning, I just uploaded update to explain.depesz.com.
New things are not really spectacular – I added help with proper explanation on what each color means and contact form in case somebody had ideas on what to do next (or complaints).
Waiting for 8.4 – Default values for function arguments + integer in any base
On 4th of December Peter Eisentraut committed patch by Pavel Stehule (with Peters tweaks) which adds default values for function arguments:
Default values for function arguments Pavel Stehule, with some tweaks by Peter Eisentraut
Continue reading Waiting for 8.4 – Default values for function arguments + integer in any base
Waiting for 8.4 – Visibility maps
Yeah. This one patch alone is worth upgrading to 8.4.
On 3rd of December Heikki Linnakangas committed his patch. Commit message:
Introduce visibility map. The visibility map is a bitmap with one bit per heap page, where a set bit indicates that all tuples on the page are visible to all transactions, and the page therefore doesn't need vacuuming. It is stored in a new relation fork. Lazy vacuum uses the visibility map to skip pages that don't need vacuuming. Vacuum is also responsible for setting the bits in the map. In the future, this can hopefully be used to implement index-only-scans, but we can't currently guarantee that the visibility map is always 100% up-to-date. In addition to the visibility map, there's a new PD_ALL_VISIBLE flag on each heap page, also indicating that all tuples on the page are visible to all transactions. It's important that this flag is kept up-to-date. It is also used to skip visibility tests in sequential scans, which gives a small performance gain on seqscans.
explain.depesz.com.
Long time ago I wrote small program to filter EXPLAIN ANALYZE output, and add summary of time.
A bit later (I guess, I don't recall exact time line, it could have been earlier) Michael Glaesemann started explain-analyze.info – cool tool for checking what might be wrong with given plan.
I'm not really happy with the emphasis Michael put on bad rowcount estimates, so I decided to write my own tool. Enter explain.depesz.com.
Basic idea is: paste your explain analyze plan, and see the output. You can click on column headers to let it know which parameter is the most important for you – exclusive node time, inclusive node time, or rowcount mis-estimate.
It is definitely not perfect. I know of at least 1 bug now, and will fix it in not-distant future.
But, as for now – you can test it, play it, or simply use it. If you'd like to change/fix something – sources are freely available. Just be warned – it's Perl ;-P