<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>select * from depesz; &#187; with</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depesz.com/tag/with/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depesz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 20:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Profiling stored procedures/functions</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/03/18/profiling-stored-proceduresfunctions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/03/18/profiling-stored-proceduresfunctions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[function]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profiling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sproc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stored]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stored procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trigger]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[window functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One database that I am monitoring uses a lot of stored procedures. Some of them are fast, some of them are not so fast. I thought &#8211; is there a sensible way to diagnose which part of stored procedure take the most time? I mean &#8211; I could just put the logic into application, and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/03/18/profiling-stored-proceduresfunctions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>11</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Calculating backlog of events to handle</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2009/10/29/calculating-backlog-of-events-to-handle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2009/10/29/calculating-backlog-of-events-to-handle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:37:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backlog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plpgsql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with recursive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1530</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yesterday on my favorite IRC channel fooqux asked interesting question. I took some more questions, and here is problem description: We have a system which, every 5 minutes, takes a number of tasks to be done. Tasks are uniform. Within 5 minutes we can handle at most 100 tasks. Given the history of number of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2009/10/29/calculating-backlog-of-events-to-handle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 8.4 &#8211; Common Table Expressions (WITH queries)</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2008/10/07/waiting-for-84-common-table-expressions-with-queries/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2008/10/07/waiting-for-84-common-table-expressions-with-queries/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 22:14:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cte]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg84]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[with recursive]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1287</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 4th of September Tom Lane committed another great patch. This one is very large, and even after applying &#8211; it&#8217;s has some rough edges. There will be need for additional patches to make the functionality fully robust, but the fact that it got committed means that it will be available in final 8.4. What [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2008/10/07/waiting-for-84-common-table-expressions-with-queries/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

