<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>select * from depesz; &#187; streaming</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depesz.com/tag/streaming/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depesz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 20:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.2 &#8211; cascading streaming replication</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2011/07/26/waiting-for-9-2-cascading-streaming-replication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2011/07/26/waiting-for-9-2-cascading-streaming-replication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:30:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cascade]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg92]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[slave]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 19th of July, Simon Riggs committed patch: Cascading replication feature FOR streaming log-based replication. Standby servers can now have WALSender processes, which can WORK WITH either WALReceiver OR archive_commands TO pass DATA. Fully updated docs, including NEW conceptual terms OF sending server, upstream AND downstream servers. WALSenders TERMINATED WHEN promote TO master. &#160; Fujii [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2011/07/26/waiting-for-9-2-cascading-streaming-replication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.1 &#8211; Synchronous replication</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2011/03/18/waiting-for-9-1-synchronous-replication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2011/03/18/waiting-for-9-1-synchronous-replication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Mar 2011 13:12:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg91]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_stat_replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sync]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[synchronous]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 6th of March, Simon Riggs committed patch: Efficient transaction-controlled synchronous replication. If a standby is broadcasting reply messages and we have named one or more standbys in synchronous_standby_names then allow users who set synchronous_replication to wait for commit, which then provides strict data integrity guarantees. Design avoids sending and receiving transaction state information so [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2011/03/18/waiting-for-9-1-synchronous-replication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.1 &#8211; pg_ctl promote</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2011/03/05/waiting-for-9-1-pg_ctl-promote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2011/03/05/waiting-for-9-1-pg_ctl-promote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 13:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg91]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 16th of February, , Robert Haas committed patch: pg_ctl promote &#160; Fujii Masao, reviewed by Robert Haas, Stephen Frost, and Magnus Hagander. Commit log is very short, functionality is not really new, but the important thing is that we&#8217;re getting support for PostgreSQL replication in more &#8220;administrative&#8221; places, which makes the whole process more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2011/03/05/waiting-for-9-1-pg_ctl-promote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OmniPITR &#8211; update</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2011/02/11/omnipitr-update-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2011/02/11/omnipitr-update-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2011 09:21:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[omnipitr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2098</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As of yesterday OmniPITR got following changes/fixes: Fixed bug which caused immediate finish request be treated the same as smart finish request. Fixed problem with using omnipitr-backup-slave on PostgreSQL 9.0 slave, which is using streaming replication. Added option to omnipitr-restore, so that you can now use it for streaming-replication slaves I&#8217;m very ashamed of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2011/02/11/omnipitr-update-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.1 &#8211; pg_basebackup</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2011/01/24/waiting-for-9-1-pg_basebackup/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2011/01/24/waiting-for-9-1-pg_basebackup/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg91]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_basebackup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walsender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 23rd of January, Magnus Hagander committed patch which adds: Add pg_basebackup tool for streaming base backups &#160; This tool makes it possible to do the pg_start_backup/ copy files/pg_stop_backup step in a single command. &#160; There are still some steps to be done before this is a complete backup solution, such as the ability to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2011/01/24/waiting-for-9-1-pg_basebackup/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.1 &#8211; pg_stat_replication</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2011/01/24/waiting-for-9-1-pg_stat_replication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2011/01/24/waiting-for-9-1-pg_stat_replication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 14:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg91]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_basebackup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_stat_replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[walsender]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2089</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 7th of January (I know, it was quite some time ago, I apologize for delay) Itagaki Takahiro committed patch: New system view pg_stat_replication displays activity of wal sender processes. &#160; Itagaki Takahiro and Simon Riggs. This view is very simple, but it shows all necessary information. For example, in my simple test case with [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2011/01/24/waiting-for-9-1-pg_stat_replication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.0 &#8211; Streaming replication</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/01/waiting-for-9-0-streaming-replication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/01/waiting-for-9-0-streaming-replication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg85]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BIG feature. The feature that made PostgreSQL leap from 8.4 to 9.0. Patch was written by Fujii Masao, and committed by Heikki Linnakangas on 15th of January 2010: Log Message: ----------- Introduce Streaming Replication. &#160; This includes two new kinds of postmaster processes, walsenders and walreceiver. Walreceiver is responsible for connecting to the primary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/01/waiting-for-9-0-streaming-replication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>15</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

