<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>select * from depesz; &#187; standby</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depesz.com/tag/standby/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depesz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.1 &#8211; pg_ctl promote</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2011/03/05/waiting-for-9-1-pg_ctl-promote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2011/03/05/waiting-for-9-1-pg_ctl-promote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Mar 2011 13:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg91]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[promote]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 16th of February, , Robert Haas committed patch: pg_ctl promote &#160; Fujii Masao, reviewed by Robert Haas, Stephen Frost, and Magnus Hagander. Commit log is very short, functionality is not really new, but the important thing is that we&#8217;re getting support for PostgreSQL replication in more &#8220;administrative&#8221; places, which makes the whole process more [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2011/03/05/waiting-for-9-1-pg_ctl-promote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Setting WAL Replication</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/03/11/setting-wal-replication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/03/11/setting-wal-replication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 12:57:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[failover]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1640</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are several approaches on replication/failover &#8211; you might have heard of Slony, Londiste, pgPool and some other tools. WAL Replication is different from all of them in one aspect &#8211; it doesn&#8217;t let you query slave database (until 9.0, in which you actually can run read only queries on slave. Since you can&#8217;t run [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/03/11/setting-wal-replication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.0 &#8211; removal of 0000000001.history check</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-removal-of-0000000001-history-check/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-removal-of-0000000001-history-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg85]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restore_command]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tend to write about new features in new versions of PostgreSQL, but this patch actually fixes one of the things that annoy me a lot, so here it goes: On 26th of January, Simon Riggs committed: Log Message: ----------- Fix longstanding gripe that we check for 0000000001.history at start of archive recovery, even when [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-removal-of-0000000001-history-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.0 &#8211; Streaming replication</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/01/waiting-for-9-0-streaming-replication/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/01/waiting-for-9-0-streaming-replication/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Jan 2010 23:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hot standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg85]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[replication]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The BIG feature. The feature that made PostgreSQL leap from 8.4 to 9.0. Patch was written by Fujii Masao, and committed by Heikki Linnakangas on 15th of January 2010: Log Message: ----------- Introduce Streaming Replication. &#160; This includes two new kinds of postmaster processes, walsenders and walreceiver. Walreceiver is responsible for connecting to the primary [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/01/waiting-for-9-0-streaming-replication/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

