<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>select * from depesz; &#187; srf</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depesz.com/tag/srf/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depesz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 20:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.1 &#8211; ALTER TYPE</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/10/16/waiting-for-9-1-alter-type/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/10/16/waiting-for-9-1-alter-type/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Oct 2010 18:43:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[alter type]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg91]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[srf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[type]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 26th of September, Peter Eisentraut committed patch which adds: Add ALTER TYPE ... ADD/DROP/ALTER/RENAME ATTRIBUTE &#160; Like with tables, this also requires allowing the existence of composite types with zero attributes. &#160; reviewed by KaiGai Kohei Custom types, do not get much coverage, but I personally like them. I much prefer to use them [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/10/16/waiting-for-9-1-alter-type/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 8.4 &#8211; pl/* srf functions in selects</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2008/11/03/waiting-for-84-pl-srf-functions-in-selects/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2008/11/03/waiting-for-84-pl-srf-functions-in-selects/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 12:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg84]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pl/*]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plpgsql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[select]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[srf]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1305</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 28th of October Tom Lane committed his patch that changes some internals of functions, but it also adds interesting capability. Commit message: Extend ExecMakeFunctionResult() to support set-returning functions that return via a tuplestore instead of value-per-call. Refactor a few things to reduce ensuing code duplication with nodeFunctionscan.c. This represents the reasonably noncontroversial part of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2008/11/03/waiting-for-84-pl-srf-functions-in-selects/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>6</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 8.4 &#8211; RETURNS TABLE</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2008/08/04/waiting-for-84-returns-table/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2008/08/04/waiting-for-84-returns-table/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Aug 2008 12:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg84]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[returns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[srf]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[table]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1229</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Pavel Stehule wrote, and Tom Lane committed patch which ads new syntax for set-returning functions: &#8220;RETURNS TABLE&#8221;. Commit was on 18th of July, and the message was: Implement SQL-spec RETURNS TABLE syntax for functions. &#160; (Unlike the original submission, this patch treats TABLE output parameters as being entirely equivalent to OUT parameters -- tgl) &#160; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2008/08/04/waiting-for-84-returns-table/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

