<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>select * from depesz; &#187; restore</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depesz.com/tag/restore/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depesz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.0 &#8211; removal of 0000000001.history check</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-removal-of-0000000001-history-check/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-removal-of-0000000001-history-check/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 14:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg85]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pitr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recovery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restore_command]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[standby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1594</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I tend to write about new features in new versions of PostgreSQL, but this patch actually fixes one of the things that annoy me a lot, so here it goes: On 26th of January, Simon Riggs committed: Log Message: ----------- Fix longstanding gripe that we check for 0000000001.history at start of archive recovery, even when [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-removal-of-0000000001-history-check/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 8.4 &#8211; parallel restoration of dumps</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2009/02/09/waiting-for-84-parallel-restoration-of-dumps/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2009/02/09/waiting-for-84-parallel-restoration-of-dumps/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 12:27:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[parallel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg84]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_dump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_restore]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restore]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1377</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 2nd of February Andrew Dunstan committed his patch (with editing by Tom Lane) that: Log Message: ----------- Provide for parallel restoration from a custom format archive. Each data and post-data step is run in a separate worker child (a thread on Windows, a child process elsewhere) up to the concurrent number specified by the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2009/02/09/waiting-for-84-parallel-restoration-of-dumps/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

