<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>select * from depesz; &#187; pg_table_size</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depesz.com/tag/pg_table_size/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depesz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:35:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.2 &#8211; NULLS from pg_*_size() functions</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2012/01/22/waiting-for-9-2-nulls-from-pg__size-functions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2012/01/22/waiting-for-9-2-nulls-from-pg__size-functions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Jan 2012 15:51:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[exception]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg92]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_relation_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_stat_user_functions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_table_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_total_relation_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[plpgsql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2361</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 19t of January, Heikki Linnakangas committed patch: Make pg_relation_size() and friends return NULL if the object doesn't exist. &#160; That avoids errors when the functions are used in queries like &#34;SELECT pg_relation_size(oid) FROM pg_class&#34;, and a table is dropped concurrently. &#160; Phil Sorber This patch on its own is not very visible, but it [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2012/01/22/waiting-for-9-2-nulls-from-pg__size-functions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.0 &#8211; table and index sizes</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-table-and-index-sizes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-table-and-index-sizes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg85]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_indexes_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_relation_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_table_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_total_relation_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[size]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 19th of January Tom Lane committed really brilliant patch: Log Message: ----------- Add pg_table_size() and pg_indexes_size() to provide more user-friendly wrappers around the pg_relation_size() function. &#160; Bernd Helmle, reviewed by Greg Smith Why is it brilliant? Because I&#8217;m lazy. And I think it&#8217;s a virtue, and not flaw. Let&#8217;s consider this example: create table [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-table-and-index-sizes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

