<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>select * from depesz; &#187; charts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depesz.com/tag/charts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depesz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 20:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.2 &#8211; deadlock counter</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2012/02/09/waiting-for-9-2-deadlock-counter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2012/02/09/waiting-for-9-2-deadlock-counter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 08:37:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[deadlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg92]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_stat_database]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 26th of January, Magnus Hagander committed patch: Adds a counter that tracks number of deadlocks that occurred in each database to pg_stat_database. &#160; Magnus Hagander, reviewed by Jaime Casanova It&#8217;s similar to previously described patch &#8211; another column in pg_stat_database: $ SELECT datname, deadlocks FROM pg_stat_database; datname │ deadlocks ───────────┼─────────── template0 │ 0 depesz [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2012/02/09/waiting-for-9-2-deadlock-counter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.2 &#8211; temporary file stats per database</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2012/02/07/waiting-for-9-2-temporary-file-stats-per-database/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2012/02/07/waiting-for-9-2-temporary-file-stats-per-database/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:35:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[log_temp_files]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg92]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[temporary]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[trends]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 26th of January, Magnus Hagander committed patch: Add counters for number and size of temporary files used for spill-to-disk queries for each database to the pg_stat_database view. &#160; Tomas Vondra, review by Magnus Hagander As you perhaps know certain operations in PostgreSQL can create temporary files. I am not talking about temporary tables &#8211; [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2012/02/07/waiting-for-9-2-temporary-file-stats-per-database/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>explain.depesz.com &#8211; new feature and some new stats</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2011/06/11/explain-depesz-com-new-feature-and-some-new-stats/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2011/06/11/explain-depesz-com-new-feature-and-some-new-stats/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Jun 2011 03:19:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[anonymization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[explain.depesz.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[statistics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stats]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[First of all, as of today, I added new feature, called anonymization. It is for all of the people who are afraid that their plans contain information that they don&#8217;t want to (or can&#8217;t) share on the internet. It works like this: Started with simple query: SELECT n.nspname AS &#34;Schema&#34;, p.proname AS &#34;Name&#34;, pg_catalog.pg_get_function_result&#40;p.oid&#41; AS [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2011/06/11/explain-depesz-com-new-feature-and-some-new-stats/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How to remove backups?</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/04/04/how-to-remove-backups/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/04/04/how-to-remove-backups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 01:10:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[backup]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ext3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[io]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iowait]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[load]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[truncate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Question from title sounds weird to you? It&#8217;s just a &#8216;rm backup_filename&#8217;? Well. I really wish it was so simple in some cases. One of the servers I&#8217;m looking into, there is interesting situation: quite busy database server (2k tps is the low point of the day) very beefy hardware daily backups, each sized at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/04/04/how-to-remove-backups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>21</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>dell powervault md1000 &#8211; storage test</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2007/09/25/dell-powervault-md1000-storage-test/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2007/09/25/dell-powervault-md1000-storage-test/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:33:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hardware]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[storage]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/09/25/dell-powervault-md1000-storage-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i recently got new toy for tests &#8211; brand new dell powervault md1000. what&#8217;s this, you ask? basically &#8211; a rather nice das (direct attached storage) from dell. the box i got had 15 sas discs, each disc being 72gb, 15krpm. since this will be used as database storage, i wanted to make some performance [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2007/09/25/dell-powervault-md1000-storage-test/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

