<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>select * from depesz; &#187; administration</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.depesz.com/tag/administration/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.depesz.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 07 May 2012 20:34:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to let clients to create new users?</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2011/06/26/how-to-let-clients-to-create-new-users/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2011/06/26/how-to-let-clients-to-create-new-users/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jun 2011 15:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clients]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hosting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shared]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[users]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=2202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some (quite long) time ago, someone, somewhere (my memory is pretty fragile) asked a question. I don&#8217;t have it exact, but the gist was: is it possible to give some users rights to create new users, without making them superusers, and forcing new users to have access only to one particular database. After some discussion [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2011/06/26/how-to-let-clients-to-create-new-users/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 9.0 &#8211; table and index sizes</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-table-and-index-sizes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-table-and-index-sizes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 22:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg85]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_indexes_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_relation_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_table_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg_total_relation_size]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[size]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1592</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On 19th of January Tom Lane committed really brilliant patch: Log Message: ----------- Add pg_table_size() and pg_indexes_size() to provide more user-friendly wrappers around the pg_relation_size() function. &#160; Bernd Helmle, reviewed by Greg Smith Why is it brilliant? Because I&#8217;m lazy. And I think it&#8217;s a virtue, and not flaw. Let&#8217;s consider this example: create table [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/02/02/waiting-for-9-0-table-and-index-sizes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Waiting for 8.5 &#8211; VACUUM FULL change</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2010/01/11/waiting-for-8-5-vacuum-full-change/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2010/01/11/waiting-for-8-5-vacuum-full-change/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 23:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cluster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[maintenance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg85]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pg90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reindex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vacuum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1578</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Some time ago Josh Berkus wrote about possible changes in VACUUM FULL. Now these changes came to life. By now, I mean 6th of January, when Takahiro Itagaki committed his patch: Log Message: ----------- Support rewritten-based full vacuum as VACUUM FULL. Traditional VACUUM FULL was renamed to VACUUM FULL INPLACE. Also added a new option [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2010/01/11/waiting-for-8-5-vacuum-full-change/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>13</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Who/what is trashing db performance?</title>
		<link>http://www.depesz.com/2008/07/02/whowhat-is-trashing-db-performance/</link>
		<comments>http://www.depesz.com/2008/07/02/whowhat-is-trashing-db-performance/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 13:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>depesz</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[administration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[connection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misuse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[netstat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[postgresql]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tracking]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.depesz.com/?p=1218</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Every so often I need to find who exactly is damaging database performance. I mean &#8211; I have db connection which does something strange/wrong with the database, but what exactly is responsible? Switching to separate user for every program, script and developer would solve the problem, but it is not always an option. So, what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.depesz.com/2008/07/02/whowhat-is-trashing-db-performance/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

