http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/09/06/postgresql-gotchas/ Thu, 29 Jul 2010 21:40:44 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/09/06/postgresql-gotchas/comment-page-1/#comment-21324 Pythian Group Blog » Log Buffer #62: a Carnival of the Vanities for DBAs Fri, 14 Sep 2007 17:09:32 +0000 http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/09/06/postgresql-gotchas/#comment-21324 [...] writes about some PostgreSQL gotchas you might not have considered. “…don’t expect any postgresql-bashing. if you want [...] [...] writes about some PostgreSQL gotchas you might not have considered. “…don’t expect any postgresql-bashing. if you want [...]

]]> http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/09/06/postgresql-gotchas/comment-page-1/#comment-20967 depesz Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:06:54 +0000 http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/09/06/postgresql-gotchas/#comment-20967 @Robert Treat: that's because nobody really reads it :) thanks - fixed. @Robert Treat:
that’s because nobody really reads it
thanks – fixed.

]]> http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/09/06/postgresql-gotchas/comment-page-1/#comment-20966 Robert Treat Mon, 10 Sep 2007 07:02:16 +0000 http://www.depesz.com/index.php/2007/09/06/postgresql-gotchas/#comment-20966 I'm surprised no one nitpicked you on this, but in your final query, it will actually error first because you didn't alias the table first first. If you add an f after first, it would give the error you're looking for. I’m surprised no one nitpicked you on this, but in your final query, it will actually error first because you didn’t alias the table first first. If you add an f after first, it would give the error you’re looking for.

]]>